Benefits of Reusing Composite Shingles in Asphalt Roadway Construction
Hello everyone! I hope y’all have been doing well. Today, I want to talk about an interesting innovation I read about the construction of O’Hare Airport. (http://goo.gl/WjI8Ek) They collected used composite asphalt shingles and used them as part of the asphalt binder in the runway and various road type structures for the facility. In this post, I will outline the process and the benefits.
Old Shingles Are Collected:
First, shingles are collected for reuse in the system. At first, there weren’t any incentives added to motivate people to recycle used shingles. However, some incentives have been created through different programs in various locations – all them outlined in the article. One of them is a ban on sending large amounts of shingles to the landfill. Another concept is an increased charge for disposing of shingles as compared to providing them for reuse. The only exception is shingles that incorporate asbestos in their production and various limitations are discussed for reducing that risk. Overall, the incentives seemed effective in my opinion.
Shingles are mixed into a pure asphalt binder:
The next step is that shingles are ground up and melted. Once melted, this product can be added to the pure asphalt binder to increase the volume of this asphalt binder product. At O’Hare airport, the shingles made up a 3% percent portion. This didn’t make a huge dent in the budget but depending on the project it could reduce costs more. Statistics and comparisons are provided in the article.
Asphalt is Laid Like Normal:
The asphalt binder and resulting asphalt is used like before. As long as any differences in material properties are accounted for, the design and construction remains the same. This results in an easy implementation on the construction and design side of the process.
Reduced Use of Oil:
Oil is a precious commodity; anytime it’s usage is reduced, I consider it a good thing. Along with that, it is easier to get a hold of used shingles than oil. For both of these reasons, I consider the reduced oil usage a considerable benefit.
The cost of using reused shingles is lower than using a pure asphalt binder. Unless the scale is large, it is a minimal cost difference. However, considering the scale of infrastructure cost these days and the amount of repairs needed, the scale is large enough that it would make a difference.
These shingles, if not used in this capacity, would most likely be going to a landfill. The lack of landfill space and shear quantity of human waste going to landfills is a current issue and reducing the amount from the housing would be a large contribution towards reducing that waste.
What is your opinion on the usage of this mixed asphalt binder? Does it provide enough benefits to outweigh the cost and effort of changing the process? Are there any noteworthy drawbacks or additional benefits not mentioned? Thanks for your time and have a good week!
Jon Hilkevitch, “Getting Around: Old Shingles Get New Life on O’Hare Runway”, Chicago Tribune News, June 30, 2014, http://goo.gl/WjI8Ek
“Why Homeowners Should Choose Asphalt Roofing Shingles Recycling”, Asphalt Roofing Shingles Recycling, October 18, 2012, http://goo.gl/u9l7cD